[3]I might have been like Don Elkins, but I didn't.

If you think the way he lives doesn't ring right, this message may be for you.

It is fun to understand something and expand your horizons, which goes to spiritual realm as well. But here lies a huge trap: you can know spiritual things, but you can't fathom those who undergo deeper spiritual experiences.
The point is experience. What sums up the structure of mind, body, spirit is a useful knowledge, so are chakra, ancient civilization, how the afterworld is like and so on. Some channelers or messengers are highly intelligent, but most of them talk and write the way ordinary people do.

Here the unique point of spiritual knowledge derives all from characteristic people who are highly keen on the undercurrent, the fundamental enegy that permeates everything. This ability is psychic, which can be developed in anyone but too subtle to be shared publicly.

For example, when you face someone intelligent, you judge so based on her facial expression, wording or anyhing else. Here the channelers first feel an energy that intellectual people give off, and expect her to be an intelligent being, then realize her as an intelligent person based on her facial expression, wording and so on. This is why channelers can be called hyper sensitive beings.

This subtlety is a key to spirtuality and energy understandings in general. Human beings can produce a variety of energy from intellectual, competitive, meditative, kind, and so on. Understanding each difference and application is what spiritually-minded people are good at, whom you can consult.

I'm afraid that it took a bit much to talk about Don Elkins. Yes, the reason why I never follow the Don's way of spiritual and cosmic being pursuit is solely because his way took less care of the hardship of channelers, for him Carla Rueckert, who are hyper-sensitive and so more prone to get vexed by negativity than Elkins.

I am married to a female channeler. So I've seen how much effort it takes for her to channel messages from cosmic beings.

The messages given by cosmic beings should be evaluated by Saniwa, an associate of a channeler, sranding next to her. Elkins was this associate. But he killed himself at a later time since the channeling between Ra began; then Rueckert lived on even after his death.

Why Elkins commited suicide? My guess is he was addicted to intellectual understanding of the Law of One. If he was tuned enough to appreciate and prioritize Energy understanding to intellectual understanding, we would have had a different consequence.

That is, Elkins didn't empathize with Rueckert a channeler. She worried about Elkins before his death and gave him some advice to feel well, but he prioritized his mindset, the want for further knowledge and fell into despair. This fact will not get popular but it is true. I wouldn't let this happen again.